Compare models
Choose two or three models, including exact thinking and fast versions. Copy the URL to share your selection.
| Comparison | Claude Opus 5.5 Maxanthropic/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh | Choose model 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Chat | — |
| TokenBaazar price · 50% off | ₹192.00 in / ₹960.00 out per 1M tokens | — |
| Market price | ₹384.00 in / ₹1920.00 out per 1M tokens | — |
| Context window (provider) | 1,000,000 tokens | — |
| Input token limit (provider) | Within the context window | — |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens | — |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2026 | — |
| Vendor input modalities | Text, Image | — |
| Vendor output modalities | Text | — |
| TokenBaazar endpoints | POST /v1/chat/completions · POST /v1/messages | — |
| TokenBaazar input | Text, Image/PDF content through the chat bridge | — |
| TokenBaazar output | Text | — |
| Benchmark evidence | 5 source-linked results | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 60% Explicitly the Xhigh effort configuration ('Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)') on AA's independently-run Terminal-Bench 4.0 harness — matches the requested Opus 5.5 xhigh condition exactly, not max/fast/default. Distinct from Anthropic's own self-reported xhigh figure of 66.4% already on file (different methodology/harness) and from AA's narrative max-effort figure of 59.6% quoted in AA's launch article. Artificial Analysis · Opus 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Opus 5 (High) comparison | — |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | 62% Explicitly the xhigh effort configuration ('Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)'); AA also separately reports 59% at max effort for the same model on this benchmark — kept distinct and not merged. Independent AA harness, not Anthropic's own 58.7% (max effort) figure already on file. Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 leaderboard launch post (LinkedIn) | — |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 56% Row explicitly labeled 'Opus 5.5 Extra High' (xhigh) at 56.0%, $6.98/task. Kept distinct from the existing 57.8% entry, which is Anthropic's own self-reported max-effort figure from the launch page, and from CursorBench's own 'Opus 5.5 Max' row (57.8%, $13.43/task) — same number as Anthropic's but a separately sourced/priced data point. Cursor · CursorBench 4.0 public leaderboard | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) | 51.42% Cognition FrontierCode 1.1; Claude Opus 5.5; xhigh effort; claude-code harness; Main subset (100 tasks). Published weighted rubric score (new_score × 100), not the all-or-nothing pass rate; solution-source violations score zero. Source field new_score=0.5142. Publisher evaluation, not a TokenBazaar measurement; provider effort configuration is not a guarantee of the API's fixed thinking budget. Cognition · FrontierCode 1.1 original leaderboard | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Extended) | 63.53% Cognition FrontierCode 1.1; Claude Opus 5.5; xhigh effort; claude-code harness; Extended subset (150 tasks). Published weighted rubric score (new_score × 100), not the all-or-nothing pass rate; solution-source violations score zero. Source field new_score=0.6353. Publisher evaluation, not a TokenBazaar measurement; provider effort configuration is not a guarantee of the API's fixed thinking budget. Cognition · FrontierCode 1.1 original leaderboard | — |
No overall score, winner or cost-versus-score frontier is calculated without comparable, attributable benchmark evidence. Different test configurations appear separately. Vendor capabilities are distinct from TokenBaazar API support.
— means no published value or no matching capability. Provider token limits are not tested gateway guarantees; TokenBaazar media controls and response formats are listed separately.
Claude Opus 5.5 Max
Sources and verification
Provider specifications describe the upstream model, not a guarantee of every feature through TokenBazaar. Prices come from the enabled catalog; benchmark results belong to the exact tested model.
- Provider model specifications
Vendor-reported
Last checked - Anthropic · Claude Opus 5.5 launch evaluation
Vendor-reported
Last checked - Artificial Analysis · Claude Opus 5.5 release page
Third-party report
Last checked - Artificial Analysis · 'Claude Opus 5.5 takes the top spot' article
Third-party report
Last checked - Artificial Analysis · Opus 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Opus 5 (High) comparison
Third-party report
Last checked - Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 leaderboard launch post (LinkedIn)
Third-party report
Last checked - Cursor · CursorBench 4.0 public leaderboard
Third-party report
Last checked - Cognition · FrontierCode 1.1 original leaderboard
Third-party report
Last checked
Research notes (1)
- Published provider limits; maximum-capacity requests have not been independently exercised through TokenBaazar. Thinking-level variants use the same provider model; reasoning and answer tokens share the output budget.