Models and Pricing

Compare models

Choose two or three models, including exact thinking and fast versions. Copy the URL to share your selection.

ComparisonClaude Sonnet 5
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5
Choose model 2
TypeChat—
TokenBaazar price · 50% off₹96.00 in / ₹480.00 out per 1M tokens—
Market price₹192.00 in / ₹960.00 out per 1M tokens—
Context window (provider)1,000,000 tokens—
Input token limit (provider)Within the context window—
Maximum output128,000 tokens—
Knowledge cutoffJan 2026—
Vendor input modalitiesText, Image—
Vendor output modalitiesText—
TokenBaazar endpointsPOST /v1/chat/completions · POST /v1/messages—
TokenBaazar inputText, Image/PDF content through the chat bridge—
TokenBaazar outputText—
Benchmark evidence4 source-linked results—
GMMLU
89%

Fable 5.1 system card section 8.18 comparison table: adaptive thinking max effort, single trial, no tools or custom system prompts. Published comparison, not catalog medium effort.

Anthropic Fable 5.1 system card · sections 8.1–8.11
—
MILU
89.3%

Fable 5.1 system card section 8.18 comparison table: adaptive thinking max effort, single trial, no tools or custom system prompts. Published comparison, not catalog medium effort.

Anthropic Fable 5.1 system card · sections 8.1–8.11
—
FrontierCode v1.1 (Extended)
49.28%

Cognition FrontierCode 1.1; Claude Sonnet 5; medium effort; claude-code harness; Extended subset (150 tasks). Published weighted rubric score (new_score × 100), not the all-or-nothing pass rate; solution-source violations score zero. Source field new_score=0.4928. Publisher evaluation, not a TokenBazaar measurement; provider effort configuration is not a guarantee of the API's fixed thinking budget.

Cognition · FrontierCode 1.1 original leaderboard
—
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)
35.2%

Cognition FrontierCode 1.1; Claude Sonnet 5; medium effort; claude-code harness; Main subset (100 tasks). Published weighted rubric score (new_score × 100), not the all-or-nothing pass rate; solution-source violations score zero. Source field new_score=0.352. Publisher evaluation, not a TokenBazaar measurement; provider effort configuration is not a guarantee of the API's fixed thinking budget.

Cognition · FrontierCode 1.1 original leaderboard
—

No overall score, winner or cost-versus-score frontier is calculated without comparable, attributable benchmark evidence. Different test configurations appear separately. Vendor capabilities are distinct from TokenBaazar API support.

— means no published value or no matching capability. Provider token limits are not tested gateway guarantees; TokenBaazar media controls and response formats are listed separately.

Claude Sonnet 5

Sources and verification

Provider specifications describe the upstream model, not a guarantee of every feature through TokenBazaar. Prices come from the enabled catalog; benchmark results belong to the exact tested model.

Research notes (1)
  • Published provider limits; maximum-capacity requests have not been independently exercised through TokenBaazar. Thinking-level variants use the same provider model; reasoning and answer tokens share the output budget.