Compare models
Choose two or three models, including exact thinking and fast versions. Copy the URL to share your selection.
| Comparison | Gemini 3.7 Flashgoogle/gemini-3.7-flash | Choose model 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Chat | — |
| TokenBaazar price · 50% off | ₹36.00 in / ₹180.00 out per 1M tokens | — |
| Market price | ₹72.00 in / ₹360.00 out per 1M tokens | — |
| Context window (provider) | Not applicable | — |
| Input token limit (provider) | 1,048,576 tokens | — |
| Maximum output | 65,536 tokens | — |
| Vendor input modalities | Not verified | — |
| Vendor output modalities | Not verified | — |
| TokenBaazar endpoints | POST /v1/chat/completions | — |
| Benchmark evidence | 7 source-linked results | — |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 43.6% Official Google-reported score at launch, Aug 13 2026, vs Gemini 3.6 Flash baseline of 34.4%. Published source text: improved performance in generating production-ready code as seen in FrontierCode 1.1 Main (43.6% vs 34.4%) Google Blog – Introducing Gemini 3.7 Flash | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 65.3% Official Google-reported score at launch, Aug 13 2026; same DeepSWE v1.1 effort/harness used for Gemini 3.6 Flash's 49.0% baseline. Published source text: DeepSWE v1.1 (65.3% vs 49.0%) Google Blog – Introducing Gemini 3.7 Flash | — |
| WebDev Arena Elo | 1588elo Official Google-reported score at launch, Aug 13 2026. Published source text: outperforms 3.6 Flash on Arena.ai's WebDev Arena with an Elo score of 1588 vs 1538 Google Blog – Introducing Gemini 3.7 Flash | — |
| GDP.pdf | 34% Official Google-reported score at launch, Aug 13 2026. Published source text: significantly outperforms 3.6 Flash on the GDP.pdf benchmark (34.0% vs 22.0%) Google Blog – Introducing Gemini 3.7 Flash | — |
| AutomationBench | 30.4% Official Google-reported score at launch, Aug 13 2026. Published source text: surpasses 3.6 Flash in AutomationBench ... (30.4% vs 17.0%) Google Blog – Introducing Gemini 3.7 Flash | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Extended) | 56.27% Cognition FrontierCode 1.1; Gemini 3.7 Flash; medium effort; chisel harness; Extended subset (150 tasks). Published weighted rubric score (new_score × 100), not the all-or-nothing pass rate; solution-source violations score zero. Source field new_score=0.5627. Publisher evaluation, not a TokenBazaar measurement; provider effort configuration is not a guarantee of the API's fixed thinking budget. Cognition · FrontierCode 1.1 original leaderboard | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) | 43.59% Cognition FrontierCode 1.1; Gemini 3.7 Flash; medium effort; chisel harness; Main subset (100 tasks). Published weighted rubric score (new_score × 100), not the all-or-nothing pass rate; solution-source violations score zero. Source field new_score=0.4359. Publisher evaluation, not a TokenBazaar measurement; provider effort configuration is not a guarantee of the API's fixed thinking budget. Cognition · FrontierCode 1.1 original leaderboard | — |
No overall score, winner or cost-versus-score frontier is calculated without comparable, attributable benchmark evidence. Different test configurations appear separately. Vendor capabilities are distinct from TokenBaazar API support.
— means no published value or no matching capability. Provider token limits are not tested gateway guarantees; TokenBaazar media controls and response formats are listed separately.
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Sources and verification
Provider specifications describe the upstream model, not a guarantee of every feature through TokenBazaar. Prices come from the enabled catalog; benchmark results belong to the exact tested model.
- Provider model specifications
Vendor-reported
Last checked - Google Blog – Introducing Gemini 3.7 Flash
Vendor-reported
Last checked - Cognition · FrontierCode 1.1 original leaderboard
Third-party report
Last checked
Research notes (1)
- Published provider limits; maximum-capacity requests have not been independently exercised through TokenBaazar. Thinking-level variants use the same provider model; reasoning and answer tokens share the output budget.