Models and Pricing

Compare models

Choose two or three models, including exact thinking and fast versions. Copy the URL to share your selection.

ComparisonGPT-5 Mini Deep
openai/gpt-5-mini-high
Choose model 2
TypeChat—
TokenBaazar price · 50% off₹12.00 in / ₹96.00 out per 1M tokens—
Market price₹24.00 in / ₹192.00 out per 1M tokens—
Context window (provider)400,000 tokens—
Input token limit (provider)Within the context window—
Maximum output128,000 tokens—
Knowledge cutoffMay 31, 2024—
Vendor input modalitiesText, Image—
Vendor output modalitiesText—
TokenBaazar endpointsPOST /v1/chat/completions—
TokenBaazar inputText, Image/PDF content through the chat bridge—
TokenBaazar outputText—
Benchmark evidence11 source-linked results—
AA Intelligence Index
17index

Published configuration: reasoning_effort: high. Source-reported result, not the catalog default unless the effort matches. Intelligence Index | 17 | 13* |

Artificial Analysis - GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano comparison
—
AA-Briefcase v1.1
424score

Published configuration: reasoning_effort: high. Source-reported result, not the catalog default unless the effort matches. AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 424 | |

Artificial Analysis - GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano comparison
—
GDPval-AA v2.1
770score

Published configuration: reasoning_effort: high. Source-reported result, not the catalog default unless the effort matches. GDPval-AA v2.1 | 770 | |

Artificial Analysis - GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano comparison
—
AutomationBench-AA
6%

Published configuration: reasoning_effort: high. Source-reported result, not the catalog default unless the effort matches. AutomationBench-AA | 6% | |

Artificial Analysis - GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano comparison
—
Terminal-Bench 4.0
0%

Published configuration: reasoning_effort: high. Source-reported result, not the catalog default unless the effort matches. Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 0% | |

Artificial Analysis - GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano comparison
—
SciCode
39%

Published configuration: reasoning_effort: high. Source-reported result, not the catalog default unless the effort matches. SciCode | 39% | |

Artificial Analysis - GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano comparison
—
Humanity's Last Exam
21%

Published configuration: reasoning_effort: high. Source-reported result, not the catalog default unless the effort matches. Humanity's Last Exam | 21% | 9% |

Artificial Analysis - GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano comparison
—
GDP.pdf
8%

Published configuration: reasoning_effort: high. Source-reported result, not the catalog default unless the effort matches. GDP.pdf | 8% | |

Artificial Analysis - GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano comparison
—
CritPt
0%

Published configuration: reasoning_effort: high. Source-reported result, not the catalog default unless the effort matches. CritPt | 0% | 0% |

Artificial Analysis - GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano comparison
—
AA-Omniscience
-17score

Published configuration: reasoning_effort: high. Source-reported result, not the catalog default unless the effort matches. AA-Omniscience | −17 | −29 |

Artificial Analysis - GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano comparison
—
AA-LCR v1.1
72%

Published configuration: reasoning_effort: high. Source-reported result, not the catalog default unless the effort matches. AA-LCR v1.1 | 72% | 45% |

Artificial Analysis - GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano comparison
—

No overall score, winner or cost-versus-score frontier is calculated without comparable, attributable benchmark evidence. Different test configurations appear separately. Vendor capabilities are distinct from TokenBaazar API support.

— means no published value or no matching capability. Provider token limits are not tested gateway guarantees; TokenBaazar media controls and response formats are listed separately.

GPT-5 Mini Deep

Sources and verification

Provider specifications describe the upstream model, not a guarantee of every feature through TokenBazaar. Prices come from the enabled catalog; benchmark results belong to the exact tested model.

Research notes (1)
  • Published provider limits; maximum-capacity requests have not been independently exercised through TokenBaazar. Thinking-level variants use the same provider model; reasoning and answer tokens share the output budget.