google / Chat
Gemini 3.1 Pro
google/gemini-3.1-pro-previewNext-gen Gemini Pro reasoning
Catalog status
Enabled
Research checked
2026-10-06
Price / performance
What it costs to get this result
GPQA Diamond · Source-reported results, not a composite ranking. Prices use the average of TokenBazaar input and output rates per million tokens; actual spend depends on usage. Test configurations differ.
Blended price / 1M tokens · log scale
Compare sourced models on this benchmark
Benchmark results
Results are source-attributed, not TokenBazaar measurements. Different tests and thinking variants are not interchangeable.
5 of 5 results
ARC-AGI-2
Reasoning · Vendor-reported
Test conditions and source
ARC Prize Verified, semi-private set, self-computed by Google per official gemini_3-1_pro_model_evaluation.pdf methodology (pass@1, single attempt, default gemini-3.1-pro-preview sampling). Published source text: On ARC-AGI-2 ... 3.1 Pro achieved a verified score of 77.1%. This is more than double the reasoning performance of 3 Pro.
Tested model: google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Google Blog – Gemini 3.1 Pro: A smarter model for your most complex tasks · Checked 2026-10-06
GPQA Diamond
Reasoning · Third-party report
Test conditions and source
Self-computed by Google per official Gemini 3.1 Pro model-evaluation methodology PDF (pass@1, single-attempt, gemini-3.1-pro-preview default settings, Feb 2026). Published source text: 94.3% on GPQA Diamond
Tested model: google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
NxCode – Gemini 3.1 Pro Complete Guide 2026 (citing Google launch benchmarks) · Checked 2026-10-06
SWE-bench Verified
Coding · Third-party report
Test conditions and source
Self-computed per official methodology PDF: single-attempt scaffolding, averaged over 10x runs, gemini-3.1-pro-preview, Feb 2026. Published source text: 80.6% on SWE-Bench Verified
Tested model: google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
NxCode – Gemini 3.1 Pro Complete Guide 2026 (citing Google launch benchmarks) · Checked 2026-10-06
LiveCodeBench Pro Elo
Coding · Third-party report
Test conditions and source
Public leaderboard Elo score as reported in Google's official Gemini 3.1 Pro model-evaluation PDF (Feb 2026). Published source text: LiveCodeBench Pro | 2887 Elo | Coding evaluation
Tested model: google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
S5 Labs – Gemini 3.1 Pro Leads 12 of 18 Benchmarks · Checked 2026-10-06
BrowseComp
Agentic · Third-party report
Test conditions and source
Deep Research configuration (search, python, browsing access) per official Gemini 3.1 Pro evaluation methodology, Feb 2026. Published source text: BrowseComp | 85.9% | Web browsing comprehension
Tested model: google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
S5 Labs – Gemini 3.1 Pro Leads 12 of 18 Benchmarks · Checked 2026-10-06
Model specifications
Input token limit
1.05M
Published provider limit
Maximum output
65.54K
Published provider limit
Input and output modalities
Provider-reported formats; API compatibility is detailed below.
Input
Output
- Exact model ID
- google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
- Model type
- Chat
- Input token limit
- 1,048,576 tokens
- Maximum output
- 65,536 tokens
Input token limits describe provider input capacity. Published provider limits are not independently tested TokenBazaar request limits.
Versions and thinking levels
One enabled version is currently listed for this model.
Features and tool support
TokenBazaar’s exposed interface, not every feature advertised by the provider. “Available” describes the implemented interface, not a successful test of every input or tool.
Reasoning configuration
No independent reasoning-mode guarantee is recorded for this exact model.
See enabled versions and provider sources for supported controls.
Coding and agent workflows
Text/code generation and customer-managed tool loops.
Coding benchmark results do not establish a hosted terminal, sandbox, autonomous browser or guaranteed task success.
Streaming answers
AvailableIncremental text through TokenBazaar’s chat endpoint; Claude also has native Messages access.
Customer-defined function tools
LimitedOnly customer-defined function tools are forwarded. Model/protocol compatibility applies; your application authorizes and executes every tool.
Forced or named tool selection
LimitedThe chat route accepts auto, none and required. A named-tool choice is not forwarded; exact model compatibility is not independently tested.
Images and PDFs
LimitedThe chat bridge accepts image/PDF content. Provider input modalities are listed separately; file size, content and model limits still apply.
Hosted web search / browsing
Not exposedNo provider-hosted web search or web-fetch tool is exposed. Customer-owned search can be implemented as an authorized function tool.
Hosted code execution / computer use
Not exposedNo built-in execution environment or computer-control tool is provided. Code generation is not code execution.
Hosted file search / persistent assistants
Not exposedNo hosted file-search index, Assistants endpoint or persistent provider agent is exposed.
Batch / fine-tuning / cached-price discounts
Not exposedNo public batch or fine-tuning endpoint, or separate cached-token discount, is offered here.
Sources and verification
Provider specifications describe the upstream model, not a guarantee of every feature through TokenBazaar. Prices come from the enabled catalog; benchmark results belong to the exact tested model.
- Provider model specifications
Vendor-reported
Last checked - Google Blog – Gemini 3.1 Pro: A smarter model for your most complex tasks
Vendor-reported
Last checked - NxCode – Gemini 3.1 Pro Complete Guide 2026 (citing Google launch benchmarks)
Third-party report
Last checked - S5 Labs – Gemini 3.1 Pro Leads 12 of 18 Benchmarks
Third-party report
Last checked
Research notes (1)
- Published provider limits; maximum-capacity requests have not been independently exercised through TokenBaazar. Thinking-level variants use the same provider model; reasoning and answer tokens share the output budget.