Compare model

openai / Chat

GPT-5.2 Fast

openai/gpt-5.2-low

GPT-5.2 with low thinking — fastest replies, lowest cost

Catalog status

Enabled

Research checked

2026-10-07

Benchmark results

1 reported results

Results are source-attributed, not TokenBazaar measurements. Different tests and thinking variants are not interchangeable.

1 of 1 results

lineage-bench (overall, avg of lineage-8/16/32/64/128)

Reasoning · Third-party report

Test conditions and source

gpt-5.2, reasoning.effort=low, lineage-bench (graph relationship reasoning), via OpenAI API (author states repeated directly, not only via OpenRouter). Community-reproduced micro-benchmark, not an OpenAI-published table; single independent tester, small forum post, not peer reviewed. Publisher excerpt: gpt-5.2 (low) | 0.660 | 1.000 | 0.975 | 0.800 | 0.400 | 0.125

Tested model: openai/gpt-5.2-low

OpenAI Developer Community forum · independent lineage-bench results by user sszymczy · Checked 2026-10-07

0.66accuracy (0-1)

Model specifications

Context window

400K

Published provider limit

Maximum output

128K

Published provider limit

Knowledge cutoff

Aug 31, 2025

Upstream model

Input and output modalities

Provider-reported formats; API compatibility is detailed below.

Input

Not verified

Output

Not verified
Exact model ID
openai/gpt-5.2-low
Model type
Chat
Context window
400,000 tokens
Maximum output
128,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoff
Aug 31, 2025

A context window is the total conversation budget, not a separate maximum input allowance; generated output and reasoning can use that budget. Published provider limits are not independently tested TokenBazaar request limits.

Versions and thinking levels

Choose from 4 enabled versions. The exact ID determines the version and its price; benchmark scores do not carry over between variants.

GPT-5.2₹84.00 in / ₹672.00 out per 1M tokens
GPT-5.2 Deep₹84.00 in / ₹672.00 out per 1M tokens
GPT-5.2 FastSelected₹84.00 in / ₹672.00 out per 1M tokens
GPT-5.2 Max₹84.00 in / ₹672.00 out per 1M tokens

Features and tool support

TokenBazaar’s exposed interface, not every feature advertised by the provider. “Available” describes the implemented interface, not a successful test of every input or tool.

Reasoning configuration

The catalog version determines the requested reasoning effort.

Selected effort: low. Reasoning level is not a measured intelligence or speed score.

Coding and agent workflows

Text/code generation and customer-managed tool loops.

Coding benchmark results do not establish a hosted terminal, sandbox, autonomous browser or guaranteed task success.

Streaming answers

Available

Incremental text through TokenBazaar’s chat endpoint; Claude also has native Messages access.

Customer-defined function tools

Limited

Only customer-defined function tools are forwarded. Model/protocol compatibility applies; your application authorizes and executes every tool.

Forced or named tool selection

Limited

The chat route accepts auto, none and required. A named-tool choice is not forwarded; exact model compatibility is not independently tested.

Images and PDFs

Not verified

The chat bridge accepts image/PDF content. Provider input modalities are listed separately; file size, content and model limits still apply.

Hosted web search / browsing

Not exposed

No provider-hosted web search or web-fetch tool is exposed. Customer-owned search can be implemented as an authorized function tool.

Hosted code execution / computer use

Not exposed

No built-in execution environment or computer-control tool is provided. Code generation is not code execution.

Hosted file search / persistent assistants

Not exposed

No hosted file-search index, Assistants endpoint or persistent provider agent is exposed.

Batch / fine-tuning / cached-price discounts

Not exposed

No public batch or fine-tuning endpoint, or separate cached-token discount, is offered here.

Sources and verification

Provider specifications describe the upstream model, not a guarantee of every feature through TokenBazaar. Prices come from the enabled catalog; benchmark results belong to the exact tested model.

Research notes (1)
  • Published provider limits; maximum-capacity requests have not been independently exercised through TokenBaazar. Thinking-level variants use the same provider model; reasoning and answer tokens share the output budget.